So I've been doing this blug for more than a year a now. I was looking through my archives for no good reason. I did take some lengthy breaks but I'm still doing it a year+ later. And I almost have some sort of system worked out wherein I know what I'm doing.  

 

The only thing I have to write in this post is non-sensical political whatnot. For instance some some terrorist mother-fuckers took a Philippine guy in Iraq hostage and threatened to chop his head off if the Philippine "troops" (actually there were no combat troops) weren't withdrew within some amount of time. And for some stupid reason the Philippine president actually did it. Nice job Philippines! Now they took a bunch more hostages! The stupid terrorists think they're winning! What fuck is the matter with you Philippines?! I'd say you're complacent in the murders of further hostages for doing that. You never give in to terrorists that just make it worse. Why the fuck don't you know that?  

 

And what about that Sandy Burger thing? He's the national security advisor from "the prior administration". He was looking at the new 9/11 congressional report ahead of everyone else, some documents marked "classified" or "top secret", and took some with him: in his pants. Now what the fuck is wrong with this guy anyway? Some kind of pick-up line at a local bar or somehin? "Hey baby wanna see the documents...in my pants. Nah, I don't get it either. Couldn't he just check out the documents? Why put them in your pants?  

 

As outlined in this story the people running the archive even suspected him and went out of their way to specially mark all the documents they knew he was going to look at. In particular is one memo about a really lucky break stopping a terrorist action on December 31st, 1999.  

 

So what am I going to say, eh? That he was trying to steal some documents to keep the truth of about the "prior administration's" lax policy on terrorism, trying to cover it up maybe? Maybe he's just a creep? An idiot? A moron? What kind of Security Advisor steals top-secret documents anyway? How secure were we during the 1990s anyways? This guy was in charge of security? The pants guy?! That's a good nickname, Sandy Pants. Good old sandy pants. Old, creepy, stupid, stupid sandy pants.  

 

I have often been contemplating about the middle-east, Israel/Palestein in particular, and how Palestine is merely being propped up by an irrational hatred of Jews and Israel. And how without the constant holy war against Israel with the suicide bombers and the grieving, crying people in the streets carrying a casket after Israel retaliates such a country, as Palestine would essentially crumble. Well thanks to the giant wall Israel put up to protect themselves, effectively I might add, from suicide bombers such a thing seems to be happening. Without maurders to mourn and holy wars to wage the populace is realizing what a hellhole they live and attacking their leadership. So, obviously, the holy war was just a convenient scapegoat/distraction to keep the populace from doing what they are doing now.

Now this brought me to another thought: is there something analogous going on with the venomous, untrustworthy Democrats? Is all this constant pour the gas on the flames 24/7 hatred for the President really a convenient distraction from the Democrat's own problems. Without Bush to hate would that party in essence start to crumble? I'm just one guy typing into the darkness with presumably no one reading this but it seems to me if you're really in a positive state of affairs you would not be acting so stupid and saying such vial hateful things so often. If you were happy and confident in your success you would in fact be acting cool and calm and at least half sane in arguing your point of view and convincing the populace at large your point of view is the valid one and the opposing view is in fact the wrong one. Instead it's just insane hateful babbling.  Not that I'm an expert or anything.

In other news I finally took the second A+ test today and scored a 613. I needed a 505 to pass. So only 108 points to spare on that one. Close! It did cost me $145 but hey, it's only money right? At least now I actually have money as opposed to before where I didn't have any. I was lucky to have $100 in my account at any one time never mind more than $145 to pay for an A+ test. But that's not important. What is important is that I am finally; at long last, A+ certified and can perhaps get a semi-decent job. For the record there were several typos and mistakes in the questions not to mention questions that seemingly had no correct answer. Of course I did have trouble sleeping last night so I was half asleep while I was taking it.  Even half asleep it was a very easy test. It was 80 questions that took me about an hour. Now, why didn't I do that 18 months ago? Don't answer that :-).